On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:06:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Rick Jones wrote: > > > i'd heard interesting generalities but no specifics. for instance, > > when the send is small, does TCP wait exclusively for the app to > > flush, or is there an "if all else fails" sort of timer running? > > yes there is a per-socket timer for this. According to RFC 1122 a TCP > stack 'MUST NOT' buffer app-sent TCP data indefinitely if the PSH bit > cannot be explicitly set by a SEND operation. Was this a trick question? > :-) Are you sure? The retransmit timer is not necessarily started and I don't see any other timer in 2.2 or plain 2.4 that would do that that. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] dean gaudet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fw... Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy?... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that ... Andi Kleen
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that ... Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy?... dean gaudet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that ... dean gaudet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that ... Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all t... kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile a... Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile a... kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile a... Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all t... Lincoln Dale