On 18.12.20 22:49, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 06:44:51PM +0100, Donald Buczek wrote:
Dear xfs developer,

I was doing some testing on a Linux 5.10.1 system with two 100 TB xfs 
filesystems on md raid6 raids.

The stress test was essentially `cp -a`ing a Linux source repository with two 
threads in parallel on each filesystem.

After about on hour, the processes to one filesystem (md1) blocked, 30 minutes 
later the process to the other filesystem (md0) did.

     root      7322  2167  0 Dec16 pts/1    00:00:06 cp -a 
/jbod/M8068/scratch/linux /jbod/M8068/scratch/1/linux.018.TMP
     root      7329  2169  0 Dec16 pts/1    00:00:05 cp -a 
/jbod/M8068/scratch/linux /jbod/M8068/scratch/2/linux.019.TMP
     root     13856  2170  0 Dec16 pts/1    00:00:08 cp -a 
/jbod/M8067/scratch/linux /jbod/M8067/scratch/2/linux.028.TMP
     root     13899  2168  0 Dec16 pts/1    00:00:05 cp -a 
/jbod/M8067/scratch/linux /jbod/M8067/scratch/1/linux.027.TMP

Some info from the system (all stack traces, slabinfo) is available here: 
https://owww.molgen.mpg.de/~buczek/2020-12-16.info.txt

It stands out, that there are many (549 for md0, but only 10 for md1)  
"xfs-conv" threads all with stacks like this

     [<0>] xfs_log_commit_cil+0x6cc/0x7c0
     [<0>] __xfs_trans_commit+0xab/0x320
     [<0>] xfs_iomap_write_unwritten+0xcb/0x2e0
     [<0>] xfs_end_ioend+0xc6/0x110
     [<0>] xfs_end_io+0xad/0xe0
     [<0>] process_one_work+0x1dd/0x3e0
     [<0>] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3b0
     [<0>] kthread+0x118/0x130
     [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

xfs_log_commit_cil+0x6cc is

   xfs_log_commit_cil()
     xlog_cil_push_background(log)
       xlog_wait(&cil->xc_push_wait, &cil->xc_push_lock);

Some other threads, including the four "cp" commands are also blocking at 
xfs_log_commit_cil+0x6cc

There are also single "flush" process for each md device with this stack 
signature:

     [<0>] xfs_map_blocks+0xbf/0x400
     [<0>] iomap_do_writepage+0x15e/0x880
     [<0>] write_cache_pages+0x175/0x3f0
     [<0>] iomap_writepages+0x1c/0x40
     [<0>] xfs_vm_writepages+0x59/0x80
     [<0>] do_writepages+0x4b/0xe0
     [<0>] __writeback_single_inode+0x42/0x300
     [<0>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x198/0x3f0
     [<0>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x5e/0xc0
     [<0>] wb_writeback+0x246/0x2d0
     [<0>] wb_workfn+0x26e/0x490
     [<0>] process_one_work+0x1dd/0x3e0
     [<0>] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3b0
     [<0>] kthread+0x118/0x130
     [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

xfs_map_blocks+0xbf is the

     xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);

in xfs_map_blocks().

Can you post the entire dmesg output after running
'echo w > /proc/sysrq-trigger' to dump all the block threads to
dmesg?

I have an out of tree driver for the HBA ( smartpqi 2.1.6-005
pulled from linux-scsi) , but it is unlikely that this blocking is
related to that, because the md block devices itself are
responsive (`xxd /dev/md0` )

My bet is that the OOT driver/hardware had dropped a log IO on the
floor - XFS is waiting for the CIL push to complete, and I'm betting
that is stuck waiting for iclog IO completion while writing the CIL
to the journal. The sysrq output will tell us if this is the case,
so that's the first place to look.

I think you are right here, and I'm sorry for blaming the wrong layer.

I've got the system into another (though little different) zero-progress 
situation. This time it happened on md0 only while md1 was still working.

I think, this should be prove, that the failure is on the block layer of the 
member disks:

    root:deadbird:/scratch/local/# for f in 
/sys/devices/virtual/block/md?/md/rd*/block/inflight;do echo $f: $(cat $f);done
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd0/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd1/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd10/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd11/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd12/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd13/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd14/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd15/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd2/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd3/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd4/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd5/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd6/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd7/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd8/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md0/md/rd9/block/inflight: 1 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd0/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd1/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd10/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd11/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd12/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd13/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd14/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd15/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd2/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd3/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd4/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd5/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd6/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd7/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd8/block/inflight: 0 0
    /sys/devices/virtual/block/md1/md/rd9/block/inflight: 0 0

Best

  Donald


Cheers,

Dave.

--
Donald Buczek
buc...@molgen.mpg.de
Tel: +49 30 8413 1433

Reply via email to