On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:59:30PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> @@ -1321,78 +1401,69 @@ int filemap_fault(struct vm_area_struct
> struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
> struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra;
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> + pgoff_t offset = vmf->pgoff;
> struct page *page;
> unsigned long size;
> - int did_readaround = 0;
> int ret = 0;
>
> size = (i_size_read(inode) + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> if (vmf->pgoff >= size)
> return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>
> - /* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
> - if (VM_RandomReadHint(vma))
> - goto no_cached_page;
> -
> /*
> - * Do we have something in the page cache already?
> + * Do we have something in the page cache already that
> + * is unlocked and already up-to-date?
> */
> -retry_find:
> - page = find_lock_page(mapping, vmf->pgoff);
> - /*
> - * For sequential accesses, we use the generic readahead logic.
> - */
> - if (VM_SequentialReadHint(vma)) {
> - if (!page) {
> - page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, ra, file,
> - vmf->pgoff, 1);
> - page = find_lock_page(mapping, vmf->pgoff);
> - if (!page)
> - goto no_cached_page;
> - }
> - if (PageReadahead(page)) {
> - page_cache_async_readahead(mapping, ra, file, page,
> - vmf->pgoff, 1);
> - }
> - }
> + read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> + page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, offset);
> + if (likely(page)) {
> + int got_lock, uptodate;
> + page_cache_get(page);
> +
> + got_lock = !TestSetPageLocked(page);
> + uptodate = PageUptodate(page);
> + read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
If we could avoid open coding tree_lock here (and expanding its coverage
to PageUptodate), that would be nice. I don't think it gains us too much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
