On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 11:49 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote: > > > > The purpose of patch is acceptable, but I don't know why you choose > > using ufshcd_core_* here. > > Do you mean you would like a different function name? 'ufshcd_init' > is used > already. The module is called ufshcd-core, so ufshcd_core_* seems > appropriate. > > > Also. I don't know if module_init() is a proper way here. > > Can you be more specific? It is normal to do module initialization > in > module_init().
Hi Adrian My concern that ufs_debugfs_init() is called in module_init(), but your another debugfs initialization function ufs_debugfs_hba_init(hba) called in the UFS host probe path. If these two (module_init() and module_platform_driver()) initializaiton sequence always as your expectation: ufs_debugfs_init()- ->ufs_debugfs_hba_init(), that is fine, otherwise, it is better just group them, make it simpler. Thanks, Bean
