On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:12 AM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Atish,
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 3:49 PM Atish Patra <atish.pa...@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> > memblock_enforce_memory_limit accepts the maximum memory size not the last
> > address. Fix the function invocation correctly.
> >
> > Fixes: 1bd14a66ee52 ("RISC-V: Remove any memblock representing unusable
> > memory area")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.pa...@wdc.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>
> Thank you for working on this.
>
> Tested with QEMU 5.2.0 on 32-bit 'virt' and 'sifive_u', with
> fw_jump.bin used as the -bios.
fw_dynamic should also work unless you are using more than 1G of memory.
Linux kernel can only support 1G of memory for RV32. The current
Kconfig is bit misleading and
I will send a patch to update the description.
However, kernel should be able to ignore any memory beyond what it can
address and continue.
I will investigate more.
> 32-bit 'virt' boots, but 32-bit 'sifive_u' still does not boot, which
> should be another issue because reverting the original 1bd14a66ee52 it
> still does not help 'sifive_u'.
>
Are you using more than 1G of memory ? Let me know if the kernel boots
if you use 1G.
> Tested-by: Bin Meng <bin.m...@windriver.com>
>
> I believe the following tag should also be added and patch cc'ed to
> stable-kernel:
>
> Reported-by: Bin Meng <bin.m...@windriver.com>
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10
>
> Regards,
> Bin
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-ri...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
--
Regards,
Atish
