On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:15:58PM -0800, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
> Tegra SoC has a Quad SPI controller starting from Tegra210.
The probe/remove hooks LGTM now. Just two tiny nits that caught my eye:
> + master = devm_spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*tqspi));
> + if (!master) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate spi_master\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
The memory allocater already emits an error message if it can't satisfy
a request. Emitting an additional message here isn't really necessary.
> +exit_free_irq:
> + free_irq(qspi_irq, tqspi);
> +exit_pm_disable:
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + tegra_qspi_deinit_dma(tqspi);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_qspi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct spi_master *master = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct tegra_qspi *tqspi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> +
> + spi_unregister_master(master);
> + free_irq(tqspi->irq, tqspi);
> + tegra_qspi_deinit_dma(tqspi);
> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
The order of tegra_qspi_deinit_dma() and pm_runtime_disable() is
reversed in the remove hook vis-a-vis the probe error path.
It's nicer to use the same order as in the probe error path.
Thanks,
Lukas
