On Saturday, 15 of December 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Linux never uses that register. The only user is suspend > > > save/restore, but that' bogus because it wasn't ever initialized by > > > Linux in the first place. It could be probably all safely removed. > > > > It probably is safe to remove... but we currently support '2.8.95 > > kernel loads/resumes 2.6.24 image'... which would break if 2.8 uses > > cr8. > > > > So please keep it if it is not a big problem. > > hm, so __save_processor_state() is in essence an ABI? Could you please > also send a patch that documents this prominently, in the structure > itself?
Hmm, I'm not sure if it really is an ABI part. It doesn't communicate anything outside of the kernel in which it is defined. The problem is, though, that if kernel A is used for resuming kernel B, and kernel B doesn't save/restore everything it will need after the resume, then things will break if kernel A modifies that. So, yes, we'll need to document that explicitly. Greetings, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
