Hi Anton and Andrew,

Hi Andrew,

Ah, oops!  Thank you and apologies.  Quite right the alternative patch was even 
better.  No need to apply this patch after all...

Zheng, the log_page_mask variable was removed altogether so your patch no 
longer makes sense.

Best regards,

        Anton

On 10 Dec 2020, at 02:36, Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:24:02 +0000 Anton Altaparmakov <an...@tuxera.com> wrote:

Can you please apply this?

...

--- a/fs/ntfs/logfile.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/logfile.c
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ bool ntfs_check_logfile(struct inode *log_vi, 
RESTART_PAGE_HEADER **rp)
         * optimize log_page_size and log_page_bits into constants.
         */
        log_page_bits = ntfs_ffs(log_page_size) - 1;
-       size &= ~(s64)(log_page_size - 1);
+       size &= ~(s64)(log_page_mask);
        /*
         * Ensure the log file is big enough to store at least the two restart
         * pages and the minimum number of log record pages.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1604821092-54631-1-git-send-email-alex....@linux.alibaba.com/
addressed this?

It's ok, thank you all the same!

Reply via email to