Hi,
On 04.12.20 at 12:21, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > I'd make value an unsigned long long and check for > 0xffffffff instead > of repeating the (expensive) division. (Hmm, maybe the compiler is smart > enough to not actually repeat it, but still.) I also prefer unsigned long long over u64 since thats what DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL returns. However since we have the constant U32_MAX for 0xffffffff we should use that. Thanks, Lino
