Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 09:50:00PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:14 AM Brendan Jackman <jackm...@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 05:15:52PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 05:57:26PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote: > > > > +/* Emit the ModR/M byte for addressing *(r1 + off) and r2 */ > > > > +static void emit_modrm_dstoff(u8 **pprog, u32 r1, u32 r2, int off) > > > > > > same concern as in the another patch. If you could avoid intel's puzzling > > > names > > > like above it will make reviewing the patch easier. > > > > In this case there is actually a call like > > > > emit_modrm_dstoff(&prog, src_reg, dst_reg) > > emit_insn_prefix() ?
Ah sorry, I thought you were talking about the _arg_ names. This isn't a prefix, but emit_insn_suffix sounds good.
