Hi Tom, On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:27:41AM -0800, t...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com> > > The macro use will already have a semicolon. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <dwag...@suse.de> > --- > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h > index ed9b10f8537d..86d249551b2d 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h > @@ -4970,7 +4970,7 @@ struct secure_flash_update_block_pk { > } while (0) > > #define QLA_QPAIR_MARK_NOT_BUSY(__qpair) \ > - atomic_dec(&__qpair->ref_count); \ > + atomic_dec(&__qpair->ref_count) \ Nitpick, please insert an additional tab after the remove so that the backlashes align again. Thanks, Daniel