Hi Tom,

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:27:41AM -0800, t...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
> 
> The macro use will already have a semicolon.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <dwag...@suse.de>

> ---
>  drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
> index ed9b10f8537d..86d249551b2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_def.h
> @@ -4970,7 +4970,7 @@ struct secure_flash_update_block_pk {
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #define QLA_QPAIR_MARK_NOT_BUSY(__qpair)             \
> -     atomic_dec(&__qpair->ref_count);                \
> +     atomic_dec(&__qpair->ref_count)         \

Nitpick, please insert an additional tab after the remove so that the
backlashes align again.

Thanks,
Daniel

Reply via email to