On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:28:39AM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Hi Pavan,
> 
> On Monday 23 Nov 2020 at 15:47:57 (+0530), Pavankumar Kondeti wrote:
> > When the sum of the utilization of CPUs in a power domain is zero,
> 
> s/power/performance
> 
> > return the energy as 0 without doing any computations.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkond...@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/energy_model.h | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> > index b67a51c..8810f1f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> > @@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct 
> > em_perf_domain *pd,
> >     struct em_perf_state *ps;
> >     int i, cpu;
> >  
> > +   if (!sum_util)
> > +           return 0;
> > +
> >     /*
> >      * In order to predict the performance state, map the utilization of
> >      * the most utilized CPU of the performance domain to a requested
> 
> Makes sense to me, so with nit above:
> 
> Acked-by: Quentin Perret <qper...@google.com>
> 
Thanks Quentin. I have updated the patch as per your correction. 

Thanks,
Pavan

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux 
Foundation Collaborative Project.

Reply via email to