Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Almost there.
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:08:03PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
> <snip>
>>
>> Ok. This test is broken. Please remove the == 1. You are looking
>> for == (1 << 18). So just saying: "if (htcfg & (1 << 18))" should be
>> clearer.
>>
> Fixed. Thanks!
>
>> > + printk(KERN_INFO "Detected use of extended apic ids on hypertransport
> bus\n");
>> > + if ((htcfg & (1 << 17)) == 0) {
>> > + printk(KERN_INFO "Enabling hypertransport extended apic interrupt
>> > broadcast\n");
>> > + htcfg |= (1 << 17);
>> > + write_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x68, htcfg);
>> > + }
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > +}
>>
>> The rest of this quirk looks fine, include the fact it is only intended
>> to be applied to PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB.
>>
> Copy that.
>
>>
>> For what is below I don't like the way the infrastructure has been
>> extended as what you are doing quickly devolves into a big mess.
>>
>> Please extend struct chipset to be something like:
>> struct chipset {
>> u16 vendor;
>> u16 device;
>> u32 class, class_mask;
>> void (*f)(void);
>> };
>>
>> And then the test for matching the chipset can be something like:
>> if ((id->vendor == PCI_ANY_ID || id->vendor == dev->vendor) &&
>> (id->device == PCI_ANY_ID || id->device == dev->device) &&
>> !((id->class ^ dev->class) & id->class_mask))
>>
>> Essentially a subset of pci_match_one_device from drivers/pci/pci.h
>>
>> That way you don't need to increase the number of tables or the
>> number of passes through the pci busses, just update the early_qrk
>> table with a few more bits of information.
>>
> copy that. Fixed. Thanks!
>
>> The extended form should be much more maintainable in the long
>> run. Given that we may want this before we enable the timer
>> which is very early doing this in the pci early quirks seems
>> to make sense.
>>
>> Eric
>
>
> New patch attached, with suggestions incorporated.
>
> Thanks & regards
> Neil
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> early-quirks.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> index 88bb83e..4b0cee1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,50 @@ static int __init nvidia_hpet_check(struct
> acpi_table_header
> *header)
> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC */
> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> +static void __init fix_hypertransport_config(int num, int slot, int func)
> +{
> + u32 htcfg;
> + /*
> + *we found a hypertransport bus
> + *make sure that are broadcasting
> + *interrupts to all cpus on the ht bus
> + *if we're using extended apic ids
> + */
> + htcfg = read_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x68);
> + if (htcfg & (1 << 18)) {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Detected use of extended apic ids on hypertransport
> bus\n");
> + if ((htcfg & (1 << 17)) == 0) {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Enabling hypertransport extended apic interrupt
> broadcast\n");
> + htcfg |= (1 << 17);
> + write_pci_config(num, slot, func, 0x68, htcfg);
> + }
> + }
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void __init check_hypertransport_config()
> +{
> + int num, slot, func;
> + u32 device, vendor;
> + func = 0;
> + for (num = 0; num < 32; num++) {
> + for (slot = 0; slot < 32; slot++) {
> + vendor = read_pci_config(num,slot,func,
> + PCI_VENDOR_ID);
> + device = read_pci_config(num,slot,func,
> + PCI_DEVICE_ID);
> + vendor &= 0x0000ffff;
> + device >>= 16;
> + if ((vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD) &&
> + (device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB))
> + fix_hypertransport_config(num,slot,func);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return;
> +
> +}
We should not need check_hypertransport_config as the generic loop
now does the work for us.
> +
> static void __init nvidia_bugs(void)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> @@ -83,15 +127,25 @@ static void __init ati_bugs(void)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static void __init amd_host_bugs(void)
> +{
> + printk(KERN_CRIT "IN AMD_HOST_BUGS\n");
> + check_hypertransport_config();
> +}
Likewise this function is unneeded and the printk is likely confusing
for users.
> struct chipset {
> u16 vendor;
> + u16 device;
> + u32 class;
> + u32 class_mask;
> void (*f)(void);
> };
>
> static struct chipset early_qrk[] __initdata = {
> - { PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, nvidia_bugs },
> - { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, via_bugs },
> - { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, ati_bugs },
> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, PCI_ANY_ID,
> nvidia_bugs },
> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, PCI_ANY_ID, via_bugs
> },
> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, PCI_ANY_ID, ati_bugs
> },
> + { PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
> PCI_ANY_ID, amd_host_bugs },
> {}
So make that fix_hypertransport_config and we should be good.
> };
>
> @@ -108,25 +162,35 @@ void __init early_quirks(void)
> for (func = 0; func < 8; func++) {
> u32 class;
> u32 vendor;
> + u32 device;
> u8 type;
> int i;
> +
> class = read_pci_config(num,slot,func,
> PCI_CLASS_REVISION);
> if (class == 0xffffffff)
> break;
>
> - if ((class >> 16) != PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI)
> - continue;
> + class >>= 16;
>
> vendor = read_pci_config(num, slot, func,
> PCI_VENDOR_ID);
> vendor &= 0xffff;
>
> - for (i = 0; early_qrk[i].f; i++)
> - if (early_qrk[i].vendor == vendor) {
> - early_qrk[i].f();
> - return;
> + device = read_pci_config(num, slot, func,
> + PCI_DEVICE_ID);
> + device >>= 16;
We don't need to shift device. Although we can do:
device_vendor = read_pci_config(num, slot, func, PCI_VENDOR_ID);
device = device_vendor >> 16;
vendor = device_vendor & 0xffff;
Assuming the early read_pci_config is limited to 32bit reads.
> + for(i=0;early_qrk[i].f != NULL;i++) {
> + if (((early_qrk[i].vendor == PCI_ANY_ID) ||
> + (early_qrk[i].vendor == vendor)) &&
> + ((early_qrk[i].device == PCI_ANY_ID) ||
> + (early_qrk[i].device == device)) &&
> + ((early_qrk[i].class ^ class) &
> + early_qrk[i].class_mask)) {
> + early_qrk[i].f();
> }
> + }
>
> type = read_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func,
> PCI_HEADER_TYPE);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
