On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 06:08:18PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 12:22:31 +0100 (CET)
> Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I gave it a try:
> > - Remove existing alignment attributes from some device_id types
> > - Introduce kernel_* types with proper size and alignment for
> > cross-compilation (sample <asm/kerneltypes.h> for m68k included)
> > - Introduce BITS_PER_KERNEL_LONG, to make it clearer it applies to the
> > target
> >
> > Apart from a cross-compile session for m68k, it's untested.
> >
>
> This still requires a bit of maintenance to set up a kerneltypes.h for every
> arch.
Better doing this work once than fixing similar issues again and again.
> It also means we have to be very careful that gcc's internal alignment
> settings matched the ones in our header.
There's nothing "gcc internal" about struct alignment - remember that
any change in struct alignment would change our userspace ABI.
> Rgds
> Pierre
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
