On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:48:49 +0800
Qinglang Miao <miaoqingl...@huawei.com> wrote:
> put_device calls release function which do kfree() inside.
> So following use of sch&cdev would cause use-after-free bugs.
>
> Fix these by simply adjusting the position of put_device.
>
> Fixes: 37db8985b211 ("s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support")
> Fixes: 74bd0d859dc3 ("s390/cio: fix unlocked access of online member")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hul...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqingl...@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/s390/cio/device.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
> index b29fe8d50..69492417b 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
> @@ -1664,10 +1664,10 @@ void __init ccw_device_destroy_console(struct
> ccw_device *cdev)
> struct io_subchannel_private *io_priv = to_io_private(sch);
>
> set_io_private(sch, NULL);
> - put_device(&sch->dev);
> - put_device(&cdev->dev);
> dma_free_coherent(&sch->dev, sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
> io_priv->dma_area, io_priv->dma_area_dma);
> + put_device(&sch->dev);
> + put_device(&cdev->dev);
That change looks reasonable.
> kfree(io_priv);
> }
>
> @@ -1774,8 +1774,8 @@ static int ccw_device_remove(struct device *dev)
> ret, cdev->private->dev_id.ssid,
> cdev->private->dev_id.devno);
> /* Give up reference obtained in ccw_device_set_online(). */
> - put_device(&cdev->dev);
> spin_lock_irq(cdev->ccwlock);
> + put_device(&cdev->dev);
As the comment above states, the put_device() gives up the reference
obtained in ccw_device_set_online(). There's at least one more
reference remaining (held by the caller of the remove function). Moving
the put_device() does not fix anything here.
> }
> ccw_device_set_timeout(cdev, 0);
> cdev->drv = NULL;
