On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > On 17/11/2020 17:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:07 PM Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > On 17/11/2020 13:37, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > > > > > If you want to go the route for me rebasing my tree on top of > > > > for-mfd-next > > > > then I'd like to have at least a stable tag, so that it will be easier > > > > to > > > > provide the pull-request later on. Would that be a compromise? > > > > > > I don't usually provide immutable branches/tags unless I'm sharing > > > topic branches for other maintainers to pick-up, in order to avoid > > > merge conflicts. > > > > I think that's what Matthias is planning to do though. If he wants > > to send me a Mediatek specific branch for the soc tree, it needs to > > be based on a stable commit in the mtd tree to avoid duplicating > > the commit. > > > > Exactly, I'm the maintainer of MediaTek SoCs and I would need to pull this > patch into my tree to be able to accept the series I mentioned [1]. Can you > provide me a stable tag/branch, against just that patch or against your > whole tree?
Oh, I see. I thought you wanted to develop on top of it. Apologies. PR to follow (I'll reply directly to the patch). -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
