On 02-11-20, 12:01, Nicola Mazzucato wrote: > Second proposal: > > Another option could be for each driver to store internally the performance > dependencies and let the driver directly provide the correct cpumask for > any consumer.
>From the discussion that happened in this thread, looks like we are going to do it. > Whilst this works fine for energy model (see above), it is not the case Good. > (currently) for cpufreq_cooling, thus we would need to add a new interface for And this is not required for now as we discussed. -- viresh
