On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:42:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Subject : snd_hda_intel 2.6.24-rc2 bug: interrupts don't always > > work on Lenovo X60s > > Submitter : Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/8/255 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9332 > > Handled-By : > > Patch : > > Takashi had a patch and that has been merged. AFAIK this regression > has been fixed and we're left with a new but harmless warning. > > However Roland reported other problems and it appears that the trail went > cold (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/14/251) > > Ted was hitting some of the same problems but that trail appears to also > have gone cold (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/23/17).
Actually, not gone cold, but I stopped posting about it because it's been solved and I thought agreement had been reached that it should be pushed to mainline before 2.6.25. I am very happily running with Ingo's "snd hda suspend latency: shorten codec read" patch, which was originally intended to speed up resuming from hibernation, but which as I discovered, also has the nice side effect of eliminating the reported error. On 11/23, Takashi replied to my note (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/23/17) and suggested that Jaroslav push this patch to Linus immediately instead of waiting for 2.6.25, since it appearly solves two problems with one stone. However, I just checked, as of Linus's public, and Ingo's patch is *not* in mainline. However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in your regression list, and could we please get this patch pushed into mainline? Thanks!! - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
