From: Shijie Luo <luoshij...@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 3f08842098e842c51e3b97d0dcdebf810b32558e ]

When flags in queue_pages_pte_range don't have MPOL_MF_MOVE or
MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL bits, code breaks and passing origin pte - 1 to
pte_unmap_unlock seems like not a good idea.

queue_pages_pte_range can run in MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL mode which doesn't
migrate misplaced pages but returns with EIO when encountering such a
page.  Since commit a7f40cfe3b7a ("mm: mempolicy: make mbind() return
-EIO when MPOL_MF_STRICT is specified") and early break on the first pte
in the range results in pte_unmap_unlock on an underflow pte.  This can
lead to lockups later on when somebody tries to lock the pte resp.
page_table_lock again..

Fixes: a7f40cfe3b7a ("mm: mempolicy: make mbind() return -EIO when 
MPOL_MF_STRICT is specified")
Signed-off-by: Shijie Luo <luoshij...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmia...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalva...@suse.de>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmia...@huawei.com>
Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeil...@huawei.com>
Cc: Shijie Luo <luoshij...@huawei.com>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201019074853.50856-1-luoshij...@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index d857e4770cc8f..4e30d23943d50 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int queue_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long 
addr,
        struct queue_pages *qp = walk->private;
        unsigned long flags = qp->flags;
        int ret;
-       pte_t *pte;
+       pte_t *pte, *mapped_pte;
        spinlock_t *ptl;
 
        ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static int queue_pages_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long 
addr,
        if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
                return 0;
 retry:
-       pte = pte_offset_map_lock(walk->mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
+       mapped_pte = pte = pte_offset_map_lock(walk->mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
        for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
                if (!pte_present(*pte))
                        continue;
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ retry:
                } else
                        break;
        }
-       pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
+       pte_unmap_unlock(mapped_pte, ptl);
        cond_resched();
        return addr != end ? -EIO : 0;
 }
-- 
2.27.0



Reply via email to