From: Zeng Tao <prime.z...@hisilicon.com>

[ Upstream commit cb47755725da7b90fecbb2aa82ac3b24a7adb89b ]

UBSAN reports:

Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/time64.h:127:27
signed integer overflow:
17179869187 * 1000000000 cannot be represented in type 'long long int'
Call Trace:
 timespec64_to_ns include/linux/time64.h:127 [inline]
 set_cpu_itimer+0x65c/0x880 kernel/time/itimer.c:180
 do_setitimer+0x8e/0x740 kernel/time/itimer.c:245
 __x64_sys_setitimer+0x14c/0x2c0 kernel/time/itimer.c:336
 do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x540 arch/x86/entry/common.c:295

Commit bd40a175769d ("y2038: itimer: change implementation to timespec64")
replaced the original conversion which handled time clamping correctly with
timespec64_to_ns() which has no overflow protection.

Fix it in timespec64_to_ns() as this is not necessarily limited to the
usage in itimers.

[ tglx: Added comment and adjusted the fixes tag ]

Fixes: 361a3bf00582 ("time64: Add time64.h header and define struct timespec64")
Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao <prime.z...@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/1598952616-6416-1-git-send-email-prime.z...@hisilicon.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/time64.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/time64.h b/include/linux/time64.h
index 980c71b3001a5..2a45b8c87edbf 100644
--- a/include/linux/time64.h
+++ b/include/linux/time64.h
@@ -188,6 +188,10 @@ static inline bool timespec64_valid_strict(const struct 
timespec64 *ts)
  */
 static inline s64 timespec64_to_ns(const struct timespec64 *ts)
 {
+       /* Prevent multiplication overflow */
+       if ((unsigned long long)ts->tv_sec >= KTIME_SEC_MAX)
+               return KTIME_MAX;
+
        return ((s64) ts->tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC) + ts->tv_nsec;
 }
 
-- 
2.27.0



Reply via email to