On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 07:04:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 06:41:07PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/sched/types.h
> > b/include/uapi/linux/sched/types.h
> > index c852153ddb0d..b9165f17dddc 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/sched/types.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/sched/types.h
> > @@ -115,8 +115,8 @@ struct sched_attr {
> > __u64 sched_period;
> >
> > /* Utilization hints */
> > - __u32 sched_util_min;
> > - __u32 sched_util_max;
> > + __s32 sched_util_min;
> > + __s32 sched_util_max;
>
> So that's UAPI, not sure we can change the type here.
+1
I am also concerned about changing UAPI.
But if we can chage sched_util_{min/max} to __s32, use -1 to reset is better
than
adding flags.
>
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 3dc415f58bd7..caaa2a8434b9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -1413,17 +1413,24 @@ int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table
> > *table, int write,
> > static int uclamp_validate(struct task_struct *p,
> > const struct sched_attr *attr)
> > {
> > - unsigned int lower_bound = p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN].value;
> > - unsigned int upper_bound = p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MAX].value;
> > + int util_min = p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN].value;
> > + int util_max = p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MAX].value;
> >
> > - if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MIN)
> > - lower_bound = attr->sched_util_min;
> > - if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MAX)
> > - upper_bound = attr->sched_util_max;
> > + if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MIN) {
> > + util_min = attr->sched_util_min;
> >
> > - if (lower_bound > upper_bound)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - if (upper_bound > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
> > + if (util_min < -1 || util_min > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP_MAX) {
> > + util_max = attr->sched_util_max;
> > +
> > + if (util_max < -1 || util_max > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Luckily we can write that range as a single branch like:
>
> if (util_{min,max} + 1 > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE+1)
>
> which assumes u32 :-)
>
> > +
> > + if (util_min != -1 && util_max != -1 && util_min > util_max)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> I think that will compile as is, otherwise write it like ~0u, which is
> the same bit pattern.
>
