On Wed, Dec 05 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 09:07:07PM +1100, Aaron Carroll wrote: > > New write batches currently start from where the last one completed. > > We have no idea where the head is after switching batches, so this > > makes little sense. Instead, start the next batch from the request > > with the earliest deadline in the hope that we avoid a deadline > > expiry later on. > > > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think this seems reasonable. What's deadline doing in this case? > They should probably be kept in synch where possible...
Aaron sent a similar patch for deadline a while ago, so this just matches them up again. I acked that patch, it makes a lot of sense to me. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
