On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Robert Kaiser wrote:
>
> I finally found the reason why 386es have trouble booting the 2.4.0 kernel:
Good job.
> Pentiums are only lucky to not crash because they have a bigger TLB than 386s.
Actually, with the 4M pages, it's not a question of luck any more - they
just don't _have_ this bug, because on a machine with 4M pages the
"cpu_has_pse" case handles this all and the buggy code is never actually
entered.
Which explains why you'd only see this on a 386 (and I suspect your TLB
size explanation is what saved some i486-class machines, although later
i486 machines will have PSE as well).
Thanks,
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- X performance on 2.4.0 v.s. ... Alan Olsen
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 38... Brian Gerst
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on... Robert Kaiser
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 runnin... Anuradha Ratnaweera
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 runnin... Robert Kaiser
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 runnin... Miles Lane
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 runnin... Robert Kaiser
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 runnin... Miles Lane
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 runnin... Paul Gortmaker
- [SOLVED + PATCH] Re: Anybody... Robert Kaiser
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 runnin... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Brian Gerst
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? mo6
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? mo6
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Tom Leete
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? richardj_moore
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Alan Cox
- Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Robert Kaiser

