Am 2020-11-05 01:29, schrieb Stephen Boyd:
Quoting Michael Walle (2020-11-01 10:48:18)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fsl-sai.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fsl-sai.c
index 0221180a4dd7..1e81c8d8a6fd 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-fsl-sai.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fsl-sai.c
@@ -68,9 +68,20 @@ static int fsl_sai_clk_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
if (IS_ERR(hw))
return PTR_ERR(hw);
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, hw);
+
return devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get,
hw);
}
+static int fsl_sai_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct clk_hw *hw = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ clk_hw_unregister_composite(hw);
Should we add a devm_clk_hw_register_composite() API and use it here?
That way we don't need a remove function and devm can be used
throughout.
Can do. But does adding a devm_ function qualify for the -stable branch?
Or should I expect to have exactly this patch as a backport there then?
-michael
