From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilb...@interlog.com>

[ Upstream commit b2a182a40278bc5849730e66bca01a762188ed86 ]

sgl_alloc_order() can fail when 'length' is large on a memory
constrained system. When order > 0 it will potentially be
making several multi-page allocations with the later ones more
likely to fail than the earlier one. So it is important that
sgl_alloc_order() frees up any pages it has obtained before
returning NULL. In the case when order > 0 it calls the wrong
free page function and leaks. In testing the leak was
sufficient to bring down my 8 GiB laptop with OOM.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilb...@interlog.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 lib/scatterlist.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
index 5d63a8857f361..c448642e0f786 100644
--- a/lib/scatterlist.c
+++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ struct scatterlist *sgl_alloc_order(unsigned long long 
length,
                elem_len = min_t(u64, length, PAGE_SIZE << order);
                page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
                if (!page) {
-                       sgl_free(sgl);
+                       sgl_free_order(sgl, order);
                        return NULL;
                }
 
-- 
2.27.0



Reply via email to