Gerhard Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PS I wish someone would explain to me why distros insist on using WU > instead given it's horrid security record. The security record of Proftpd is not horrid, but embarrassing. They once claimed to have fixed vulnerability, but in fact introduced another one... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Ingo Molnar
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Gerhard Mack
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? J Sloan
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Michael Peddemors
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Florian Weimer
- RE: Is sendfile all that sexy? Tristan Greaves
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Dan Hollis
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jonathan Thackray
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Matti Aarnio
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? dean gaudet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Jonathan Thackray
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] sendpath() support... dean gaudet