On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:43 PM George Cherian <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Willem, > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 7:21 PM > > To: George Cherian <[email protected]> > > Cc: Network Development <[email protected]>; linux-kernel <linux- > > [email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>; David Miller > > <[email protected]>; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham > > <[email protected]>; Linu Cherian <[email protected]>; > > Geethasowjanya Akula <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] octeontx2-af: Add devlink health > > reporters for NPA > > > > External Email > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > static int rvu_devlink_info_get(struct devlink *devlink, struct > > > > devlink_info_req *req, > > > > > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) { @@ > > > > > -53,7 +483,8 @@ int rvu_register_dl(struct rvu *rvu) > > > > > rvu_dl->dl = dl; > > > > > rvu_dl->rvu = rvu; > > > > > rvu->rvu_dl = rvu_dl; > > > > > - return 0; > > > > > + > > > > > + return rvu_health_reporters_create(rvu); > > > > > > > > when would this be called with rvu->rvu_dl == NULL? > > > > > > During initialization. > > > > This is the only caller, and it is only reached if rvu_dl is non-zero. > > Did you mean to ask, where is it de-initialized? > If so, it should be done in rvu_unregister_dl() after freeing rvu_dl.
No, I meant that rvu_health_reporters_create does not need an !rvu->rvu_dl precondition test, as the only callers calls with with a non-zero rvu_dl.
