nit picking:
i would  without "else" to improve readability:

       if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
                 return -ERESTARTSYS;

        if (ret < 0)
              return -ETIMEDOUT;

          return 0;

jm2c
 wh
________________________________________
Von: Colin King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Oktober 2020 15:30:02
An: Nehal Shah; Sandeep Singh; Jiri Kosina; Benjamin Tissoires; 
linux-in...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janit...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: [PATCH][next] SFH: fix error return check for -ERESTARTSYS

From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

Currently the check for the error return code -ERESTARTSYS is dead code
and never executed because a previous check for ret < 0 is catching this
and returning -ETIMEDOUT instead.  Fix this by checking for -ERESTARTSYS
before the more generic negative error code.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
Fixes: 4b2c53d93a4b ("SFH:Transport Driver to add support of AMD Sensor Fusion 
Hub (SFH)")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c 
b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
index a471079a3bd0..4f989483aa03 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_hid.c
@@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ static int amdtp_wait_for_response(struct hid_device *hid)
                ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(hid_data->hid_wait,
                                                       
cli_data->request_done[i],
                                                       
msecs_to_jiffies(AMD_SFH_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT));
-       if (ret < 0)
-               return -ETIMEDOUT;
-       else if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
+       if (ret == -ERESTARTSYS)
                return -ERESTARTSYS;
+       else if (ret < 0)
+               return -ETIMEDOUT;
        else
                return 0;
 }
--
2.27.0

Reply via email to