On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:19:42PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:28:56 +0000
> Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:00:56AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > No the slightest. 12 seems like the correct, padded size. A size of 10
> > > > is just weird as the unpadded size is 9 bytes. Could you dump the
> > > > __mod_sdio_device_table section so we can determine if it is cropped or
> > > > just oddly padded.
> > > >
> > >
> > > err, I'd rather not. I have no shortage of bugs to be going on with here.
> > >
> > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cross-compilers/ has the i386->m68k
> > > cross-compiler which I use.
> >
> > Eh... m68k has 16bit alignment for unsigned long.
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > --- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > @@ -343,7 +343,8 @@ struct sdio_device_id {
> > __u8 class; /* Standard interface or SDIO_ANY_ID */
> > __u16 vendor; /* Vendor or SDIO_ANY_ID */
> > __u16 device; /* Device ID or SDIO_ANY_ID */
> > - kernel_ulong_t driver_data; /* Data private to the driver */
> > + kernel_ulong_t driver_data /* Data private to the driver */
> > + __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(kernel_ulong_t))));
> > };
> >
> > /* SSB core, see drivers/ssb/ */
>
> That works, but it's a bit obscure.
>
> sdio_device_id didn't exist in 2.6.23 so we still have time to turn it into
> some saner layout.
>
> Who owns this code, anwyay?
Rusty Russell (Cc'ed)
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
