Andi Kleen writes: > In my opinion (rt)netlink would benefit a lot from introducing 5-10 > new errnos and possibly a new socket option to get a string/number > with the exact error. Introducing 5-10 new errnos just for rtnetlink is a big waste when we already have socket extended errors which are perfect for this purpose. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4.0 + iproute2 Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Harald Welte
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0 + iproute2 Andi Kleen