Andi Kleen writes:
 > In my opinion (rt)netlink would benefit a lot from introducing 5-10
 > new errnos and possibly a new socket option to get a string/number
 > with the exact error.

Introducing 5-10 new errnos just for rtnetlink is a big waste when we
already have socket extended errors which are perfect for this
purpose.

Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to