On 10/14/20 11:05 AM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
Modify protocol initialization callback adding a new parameter representing
a reference to the available xfer core operations and introduce a macro to
simply register with the core new protocols as loadable drivers.
Keep standard protocols as builtin.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.maru...@arm.com>
---
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c    | 56 ++++++++++--------
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c     | 14 ++++-
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c   | 56 +++++++++---------
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h  | 42 +++++++++-----
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c  | 50 ++++++++++------
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c    | 88 +++++++++++++++--------------
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/power.c   | 46 ++++++++-------
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/reset.c   | 46 ++++++++-------
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 52 +++++++++--------
  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/system.c  | 16 ++++--
  include/linux/scmi_protocol.h       | 18 +++++-
  11 files changed, 288 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
index f40821eeb103..8d7214fd2187 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
  #define SCMI_BASE_NUM_SOURCES         1
  #define SCMI_BASE_MAX_CMD_ERR_COUNT   1024
+static const struct scmi_xfer_ops *ops;

Minor nit. I would consider renaming ops to something more
meaningful like xfer_ops (or anything that makes sense). ops by
itself leads to confusion with ops in scmo_protocol and in scmi_protocol_events.

Same suggestion for all other declarations of ops in this patch.

--
Warm Regards
Thara

Reply via email to