Hi,

this commit should NOT be applied to 5.8.
It fixes a regression introduced by
58e4d686d456c3e356439ae160ff4a0728940b8e (drm/ttm: cleanup
ttm_mem_type_manager_func.get_node interface v3) which is part of 5.9
but not 5.8.
Applying this to 5.8 will very likely break things. I don't know why it
ended up as a candidate for 5.8.

Roland

Am 12.10.20 um 15:30 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> From: Zack Rusin <za...@vmware.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit f54c4442893b8dfbd3aff8e903c54dfff1aef990 ]
> 
> ttm_mem_type_manager_func.get_node was changed to return -ENOSPC
> instead of setting the node pointer to NULL. Unfortunately
> vmwgfx still had two places where it was explicitly converting
> -ENOSPC to 0 causing regressions. This fixes those spots by
> allowing -ENOSPC to be returned. That seems to fix recent
> regressions with vmwgfx.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zack Rusin <za...@vmware.com>
> Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Krastev <krast...@vmware.com>
> Sigend-off-by: Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_thp.c           | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c
> index 7da752ca1c34b..b93c558dd86e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static int vmw_gmrid_man_get_node(struct 
> ttm_mem_type_manager *man,
>  
>       id = ida_alloc_max(&gman->gmr_ida, gman->max_gmr_ids - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (id < 0)
> -             return (id != -ENOMEM ? 0 : id);
> +             return id;
>  
>       spin_lock(&gman->lock);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_thp.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_thp.c
> index b7c816ba71663..c8b9335bccd8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_thp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_thp.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ found_unlock:
>               mem->start = node->start;
>       }
>  
> -     return 0;
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  
> 

Reply via email to