On Nov 27, 2007 10:58 AM, Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > + print_hex_dump(KERN_CONT, "", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
> > + 16, 1,
> > + buf, len, 0);
> >
> Not important, but why use '0' instead of 'false'?
after read http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/27/281, I agreed with you.
this is refreshed patch against the lastest cryptodev tree.
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Denis Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
crypto/tcrypt.c | 9 ++++-----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c
index 1e12b86..ae762c2 100644
--- a/crypto/tcrypt.c
+++ b/crypto/tcrypt.c
@@ -87,12 +87,11 @@ static char *check[] = {
"camellia", "seed", "salsa20", NULL
};
-static void hexdump(unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len)
+static inline void hexdump(unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len)
{
- while (len--)
- printk("%02x", *buf++);
-
- printk("\n");
+ print_hex_dump(KERN_CONT, "", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET,
+ 16, 1,
+ buf, len, false);
}
static void tcrypt_complete(struct crypto_async_request *req, int err)
--
Denis Cheng
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
