On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:25:44PM -0400, st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:19:02PM +0000, Harley A.W. Lorenzo wrote: > > On Monday, October 5, 2020 5:31 PM, Sudip Mukherjee > > <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > find_tt() can return NULL or the error value in ERR_PTR() and > > > dereferencing the return value without checking for the error can > > > lead to a possible dereference of NULL pointer or ERR_PTR(). > > > > Looks fine to me. There is in fact no checks of the return value > > before a dereference here, and this solves that. > > > > Reviewed-by: Harley A.W. Lorenzo <hl1...@protonmail.com > > No, this patch is wrong. In fact, these calls to find_tt() cannot > return NULL or an ERR_PTR value.
Sudip, if you would prefer to submit a patch that adds comments to those call sites explaining that find_tt() will not return NULL or an error, that would be okay. Alan Stern
