On Mon 2020-10-05 10:38:29, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Sun 2020-10-04 10:12:13, Hillf Danton wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 10:32:32 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > So having a consistent behaviour accross all these facilities makes > > > absolutely sense and I don't agree with your sentiment in the changelog > > > at all. > > > > > > Just because it does not make sense to you is not a justification for > > > making stuff inconsistent. You still have not provided a technical > > > reason why this change is needed. > > > > Given the queue method, it is no win to modify delayed work from callback > > in any case because "we are not adding interfaces just because we can." > > What about ipmi_kthread_worker_func()? It is delayed work that > queues itself.
The function name is actually mv88e6xxx_irq_poll() in upstream. The wrong name came from a patch when I worked on the API and tried to switch some kthreads to it. Best Regards, Petr
