Many thx for you comments. Consider all the obvious spelling and
grammatical mistakes you pointed out fixed, I won't mention all of them
in this reply to keep things easier to follow.
Am 02.10.20 um 18:59 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On 10/1/20 1:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> +Linus Torvalds and the leading Linux kernel developers want to see some
>> issues
>> +fixed as soon as possible, hence these 'issues of high priority' get handled
>> +slightly different in the reporting process. Three type of cases qualify:
>
> differently
> at least that's what I would say. :)
/me googles
Yeah, seems you are right, thx.
>> +from the old kernel (see below how to archive that). That's because
> achieve
>> +process is sometimes only possible by doing incompatible changes; but to
>> avoid
> eh? That's because ... ???
Argh, that was a last minute change :-/ Now reads:
That's because incompatible changes sometimes can not be avoided when
implementing big improvements are implemented; but to avoid
>> +regression such changes have to be enabled explicitly during build time
regressions
>> +configuration.
>> +
Ciao, Thorsten
