Hi Rob,

On 30/09/2020 12.14, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> New binding document for
> Texas Instruments K3 Block Copy DMA (BCDMA).
> 
> BCDMA is introduced as part of AM64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml  | 183 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 183 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c84fb641738f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/ti/k3-bcdma.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@

...

> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - ti,am64-dmss-bcdma

Would it be OK if I use ti,am64x-dmss-bcdma or should I stick with
am64-dmss-bcdma.
The TRM refers to the family as AM64x, but having the 'x' in the
compatible did not sounded right.

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

Reply via email to