On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:47 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:35 AM Nick Desaulniers > <ndesaulni...@google.com> wrote: > > > > Hello DAX maintainers, > > I noticed our PPC64LE builds failing last night: > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047043 > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047056 > > https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/388047099 > > and looking on lore, I see a fresh report from KernelCI against arm: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/?q=dax_supported > > > > Can you all please take a look? More concerning is that I see this > > failure on mainline. It may be interesting to consider how this was > > not spotted on -next. > > The failure is fixed with commit 88b67edd7247 ("dax: Fix compilation > for CONFIG_DAX && !CONFIG_FS_DAX"). I rushed the fixes that led to > this regression with insufficient exposure because it was crashing all > users. I thought the 2 kbuild-robot reports I squashed covered all the > config combinations, but there was a straggling report after I sent my > -rc6 pull request. > > The baseline process escape for all of this was allowing a unit test > triggerable insta-crash upstream in the first instance necessitating > an urgent fix.
No worries; just checking that failures are root-caused. I see it on top of v5.9-rc6: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/. I don't see it on -next today, but assume it will be there tomorrow. Thanks for the info. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
