On Nov 18, 2007 8:18 PM, Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:44 +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote: > > NFSv2/3 and NFSv4 share the same dentry_iput and so share the same > > unlink and sillyrename logic. > > But they do not share nfs_init_server()! > > > > I wonder why this doesn't blow up more violently, but only hangs... > > > > But as I don't know if it is correct to add the workqueue > > initialization to nfs4_init_server() or remove the nfs_sb_active / > > nfs_sb_deactive for the NFSv4 case, I can't offer a patch to fix this. > > > > Torsten > > I had already fixed that one in my own stack. Attached are the 3 patches > that I've got. 1 from SteveD, 2 fixes. >
Moving the init_waitqueue_head() like patch linux-2.6.24-006-fix_to_fix_sillyrename_bug_on_umount.dif and applying linux-2.6.24-007-fix_nfs_free_unlinkdata.dif lets my testcase work. Also lockdep no longer complains about the non-static key. Torsten - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
