From: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:49:37 -0800 (PST)
> Well there is an LWN article now that also claims that the cpu_alloc > patchset requires a large bss space. Sigh. See > > http://lwn.net/Articles/257828/ > > Not true! 44 bytes is reasonable. Well, the first version of the patch set, the one I tested, did require a lot of BSS space. And that's the one they are writing about. I don't see how you can even remotely claim that LWN's reporting is inaccurate here. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
