On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 06:52:20PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 11/09/20 21:28, Babu Moger wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > > index 1a5f3908b388..11892e86cb39 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c > > @@ -1003,11 +1003,11 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm) > > > > set_dr_intercepts(svm); > > > > - set_exception_intercept(svm, PF_VECTOR); > > - set_exception_intercept(svm, UD_VECTOR); > > - set_exception_intercept(svm, MC_VECTOR); > > - set_exception_intercept(svm, AC_VECTOR); > > - set_exception_intercept(svm, DB_VECTOR); > > + set_exception_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_PF_VECTOR); > > + set_exception_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_UD_VECTOR); > > + set_exception_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_MC_VECTOR); > > + set_exception_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_AC_VECTOR); > > + set_exception_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_DB_VECTOR); > > I think these should take a vector instead, and add 64 in the functions.
And "s/int bit/u32 vector" + BUILD_BUG_ON(vector > 32)?
