On 02/09/20 15:54, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <la...@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> When kvm_mmu_get_page() gets a page with unsynced children, the spt
> pagetable is unsynchronized with the guest pagetable. But the
> guest might not issue a "flush" operation on it when the pagetable
> entry is changed from zero or other cases. The hypervisor has the 
> responsibility to synchronize the pagetables.
> 
> The linux kernel behaves as above for many years, But
> 8c8560b83390("KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT for MMU specific 
> flushes)
> inadvertently included a line of code to change it without giving any
> reason in the changelog. It is clear that the commit's intention was to
> change KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH -> KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT, so we don't
> unneedlesly flush other contexts but one of the hunks changed
> nearby KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC instead.
> 
> The this patch changes it back.
> 
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200320212833.3507-26-sean.j.christopher...@intel.com/
> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Changed from v1:
>       update patch description
> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index 4e03841f053d..9a93de921f2b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -2468,7 +2468,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct 
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>               }
>  
>               if (sp->unsync_children)
> -                     kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT, vcpu);
> +                     kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC, vcpu);
>  
>               __clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sp);
>  
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo

Reply via email to