On 2020-09-11 15:28, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
There are few places in arm-smmu-impl where there are
extra blank lines, remove them
FWIW those were deliberate - sometimes I like a bit of subtle space to
visually delineate distinct groups of definitions. I suppose it won't be
to everyone's taste :/
and while at it fix the
checkpatch warning for space required before the open
parenthesis.
That one, however, was not ;)
BTW am I supposed to have received 3 copies of everything? Because I did...
Robin.
Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ran...@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
index ce78295cfa78..f5b5218cbe5b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-impl.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused
qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
static int arm_smmu_gr0_ns(int offset)
{
- switch(offset) {
+ switch (offset) {
case ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0:
case ARM_SMMU_GR0_sACR:
case ARM_SMMU_GR0_sGFSR:
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl calxeda_impl = {
.write_reg = arm_smmu_write_ns,
};
-
struct cavium_smmu {
struct arm_smmu_device smmu;
u32 id_base;
@@ -110,7 +109,6 @@ static struct arm_smmu_device *cavium_smmu_impl_init(struct
arm_smmu_device *smm
return &cs->smmu;
}
-
#define ARM_MMU500_ACTLR_CPRE (1 << 1)
#define ARM_MMU500_ACR_CACHE_LOCK (1 << 26)
@@ -197,7 +195,6 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl mrvl_mmu500_impl = {
.reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
};
-
struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
