Andi Kleen wrote:
The *real* fix for this is almost certainly to just get rid of the 64-bit code entirely, and use the 32-bit code as the base for one single unified setup.

That would likely break the ABI. x86-64 ABI is completely different here --
no ibcs, just pure x86 ISA.


Different ABIs clearly have to be handled, but I don't think that is a huge deal. The i387 code overall (not just asm/i387.h) is very different, though, and I find it unlikely that a properly unified code is going to be ready and working in the 2.6.24 timeframe. I'm exploring if a partial merge with high confidence level is feasible; either way, a proper merge for 2.6.25 is probably the right thing.

        -hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to