Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it is indeed the case that this architecture is used internally by a > single organisation then perhaps it doesn't make sense for us to merge it.
I don't know that this is so. I can ask them, but I don't know if they'll tell me that. Furthermore, it's better to have the code upstream[*]. That way the person wanting to make a sweeping change across all arches who knows how the change should be made can have a go at making the change, rather than someone who's constantly playing catchup and may not understand fully. [*] As people keep saying. Constantly playing catchup really isn't fun, as I'm sure you appreciate with maintaining the -mm tree. You, after all, do it on a much larger scale than everyone else. > I guess if it were possible to install a self-built kernel into a Panasonic > gadget then we could look at it on that basis. Do you know if that's the > case? I don't, no. Besides, I *do* have Panasonic devices I can install random software and hardware on to:-) But it's not COTS stuff. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
