IMHO linux should not drop unclassified vlan packets to pass these to sniffers.
isn't it?
But, since the __vlan_hwaccel_rx drops unclassified vlan packets, sniffers
cannot see them.
This make the __vlan_hwaccel_rx receive and process an unclassified vlan packet
as a PACKET_OTHERHOST.
Any check, comments will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/if_vlan.h | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/if_vlan.h b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
index 976d4b1..e1db5bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/if_vlan.h
+++ b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
@@ -170,21 +170,26 @@ static inline int __vlan_hwaccel_rx(struct sk_buff *skb,
unsigned short vlan_tag, int polling)
{
struct net_device_stats *stats;
+ struct net_device *vlan_dev;
if (skb_bond_should_drop(skb)) {
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
return NET_RX_DROP;
}
- skb->dev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, vlan_tag & VLAN_VID_MASK);
- if (skb->dev == NULL) {
- dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+ vlan_dev = vlan_group_get_device(grp, vlan_tag & VLAN_VID_MASK);
+ if (vlan_dev == NULL) {
+ if (skb->dev == NULL) {
+ dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
- /* Not NET_RX_DROP, this is not being dropped
- * due to congestion.
- */
- return 0;
- }
+ /* Not NET_RX_DROP, this is not being dropped
+ * due to congestion.
+ */
+ return 0;
+ }
+ skb->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
+ } else
+ skb->dev = vlan_dev;
skb->dev->last_rx = jiffies;
@@ -192,25 +197,27 @@ static inline int __vlan_hwaccel_rx(struct sk_buff *skb,
stats->rx_packets++;
stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
- skb->priority = vlan_get_ingress_priority(skb->dev, vlan_tag);
- switch (skb->pkt_type) {
- case PACKET_BROADCAST:
- break;
-
- case PACKET_MULTICAST:
- stats->multicast++;
- break;
-
- case PACKET_OTHERHOST:
- /* Our lower layer thinks this is not local, let's make sure.
- * This allows the VLAN to have a different MAC than the
underlying
- * device, and still route correctly.
- */
- if (!compare_ether_addr(eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest,
- skb->dev->dev_addr))
- skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
- break;
- };
+ if (vlan_dev) {
+ skb->priority = vlan_get_ingress_priority(skb->dev, vlan_tag);
+ switch (skb->pkt_type) {
+ case PACKET_BROADCAST:
+ break;
+
+ case PACKET_MULTICAST:
+ stats->multicast++;
+ break;
+
+ case PACKET_OTHERHOST:
+ /* Our lower layer thinks this is not local, let's make
sure.
+ * This allows the VLAN to have a different MAC than
the underlying
+ * device, and still route correctly.
+ */
+ if (!compare_ether_addr(eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest,
+ skb->dev->dev_addr))
+ skb->pkt_type = PACKET_HOST;
+ break;
+ };
+ }
return (polling ? netif_receive_skb(skb) : netif_rx(skb));
}
---
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
