Hi Leo and Al,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 04:47:50PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> From: Al Grant <al.gr...@arm.com>
>
> Commit 42bbabed09ce ("perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack")
> changed the format of branch stacks in perf samples. When samples use
> this new format, a flag must be set in the corresponding event.
> Synthesized branch stacks generated from CoreSight ETM trace were using
> the new format, but not setting the event attribute, leading to
> consumers seeing corrupt data. This patch fixes the issue by setting the
> event attribute to indicate use of the new format.
>
> Fixes: 42bbabed09ce ("perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack")
> Signed-off-by: Al Grant <al.gr...@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrea Brunato <andrea.brun...@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index c283223fb31f..a2a369e2fbb6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -1344,8 +1344,15 @@ static int cs_etm__synth_events(struct cs_etm_auxtrace
> *etm,
> attr.sample_type &= ~(u64)PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR;
> }
>
> - if (etm->synth_opts.last_branch)
> + if (etm->synth_opts.last_branch) {
> attr.sample_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK;
> + /*
> + * We don't use the hardware index, but the sample generation
> + * code uses the new format branch_stack with this field,
> + * so the event attributes must indicate that it's present.
> + */
> + attr.branch_sample_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX;
> + }
I've see this patch before... I thought it had been merged - what happened?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> if (etm->synth_opts.instructions) {
> attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
