On (20/08/26 13:23), Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 01:54:26PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:38:07PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > On (20/08/26 19:24), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > > > But then the question is why we have this code in the ->probe() at
> > > > > all?
> > > > > ->match() is run before probe by bus core, no?
> > > >
> > > > That's a good question.
> > >
> > > Everything seem to be working OK on my test board with this patch:
> >
> > I'm okay with it, but I want to hear Wolfram about this.
> > If it gets a green light to go, feel free to add
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Sergey,
>
> Can you send a proper patch (with patch description) and me and Jean
> Delvare <jdelv...@suse.de> in the To: field?
>
> The origins of this matching code are pretty old and Jean is more
> experienced there than I am. Nonetheless, I will check it, too, of
> course.
Oh, sure, will do. Is that OK if I'll base my patch on linux-next?
I'm also going to test the patch on more devices here on my side.
-ss
