On 8/25/20 2:04 PM, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote: >>> I think this is more arch-specific. Even if it becomes a new syscall, >>> we still need to pass the same parameters. >> >> Right, but without the copying in and out of memory. >> > Linux-api is already on the Cc list. Do we need to add more people to > get some agreements for the syscall? What kind of agreement are you looking for? I'd suggest just coding it up and posting the patches. Adding syscalls really is really pretty straightforward and isn't much code at all.
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functi... Dave Hansen
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl f... Yu, Yu-cheng
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prc... Dave Martin
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch... Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add ... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk:... Yu, Yu-cheng
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/sh... H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/sh... Dave Hansen
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add ... Dave Martin
- Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk:... Florian Weimer