> On Aug 21, 2020, at 14:32, Kyle Huey <m...@kylehuey.com> wrote: > > 40c45904f818c1f6555294ca27afc5fda4f09e68 added magic for a 32 bit > tracer tracing a 32 bit tracee on a 64 bit kernel, but it looks like a > 64 bit tracer tracing a 32 bit tracee on a 64 bit kernel *is* now > expected to preserve the fs/gsbase values (or die, in our case). > > Is that correct?
Correct. Thanks, Chang
